Jump to section
Some of us may take having clean air for granted. But before the Clean Air Act was enacted 50 years ago, the air in American cities was laden with toxic pollution—heavy, noxious smog you could feel when you walked outside. As a result, many people struggled with respiratory and cardiovascular health issues, and premature death was common. We’ve come a long way since then, thanks largely in part to the law, which remains one of the country’s greatest environmental successes. But we still have a ways to go.
Here are the basics of the Clean Air Act—and how this critical tool continues to protect public health despite the obstacles it faces.
What is the Clean Air Act?
The Clean Air Act is a comprehensive federal law that gives the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) authority to regulate air pollutants and polluting industries. Federal legislation to address air quality dates back to 1955 but the Clean Air Act as we know it largely comes from bipartisan amendments enacted in 1970, 1977, and 1990. The law has been instrumental in dramatically reducing the country’s air pollution over the past few decades. It also plays an important part in the U.S. economy by reducing health-care costs and absences from work or school. It authorizes the federal government to regulate and reduce greenhouse gas emissions—critical to the global mission to combat climate change. And strong regulations especially benefit low-income communities and communities of color, where polluting facilities are often located.
Why was the Clean Air Act created?
Before the existence of the Clean Air Act, unregulated industrialization and our increasing dependence on cars dramatically increased public exposure to dangerous pollutants like particulate matter and ground-level ozone, or smog. Cities like Los Angeles and New York suffered from deadly smog episodes, stemming from garbage incinerators, coal- and oil-powered plants, and other sources.
Air pollution, of course, doesn’t stop at state lines. For example, the pollution from a coal-fired power plant in the midwest can travel hundreds of miles on easterly winds, burdening downwind areas with pollution they can’t control. But at the time, there were no federal regulations, only a flimsy patchwork of local and state rules to reign in major sources of air pollution.
Today, some older generations can still recall the deadly Donora smog. In 1948, a thick yellow fog descended on the town of Donora, Pennsylvania, and in just a few days, 20 people were dead and nearly a third of the town’s population of 14,000 fell sick. The toxic smog was a lethal combination of carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and metal dust produced by the town’s zinc plant and steel mill.
The tragedy opened up a national dialogue about the seriousness of air pollution and the urgent need for robust federal legislation and standards.
When was the Clean Air Act passed?
Clean Air Act of 1970
The Clean Air Act as we know it today was born in 1970 from a significant amendment to earlier laws. The bipartisan piece of legislation passed unanimously in the U.S. Senate and 374-to-1 in the House of Representatives, before being signed into law by President Richard Nixon on December 31, 1970 under the banner of protecting clean air for “future generations of America.” The EPA—which Nixon established on December 2, 1970—was tasked with overseeing its implementation.
In this national law, Congress recognized a right to healthful air quality, wherever one lives—going against the corrosive industries that were shopping representatives for weak regulation and playing one state off against another. It marked the moment when Congress acknowledged that state efforts alone were insufficient.
The Clean Air Act of 1970 was built on important precursors:
- The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955 served as the first piece of legislation regarding air pollution and allocated federal funding for research.
- The Clean Air Act of 1963 aimed to reign in air pollution with expanded research efforts and a new public health program.
- The Air Quality Act of 1967 established that states and local governments should be in charge of their own pollution problems—but that the federal government could step in if the state failed to adequately act on its own.
Since 1970, there have also been major updates to the Clean Air Act:
- The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 included provisions to protect areas that still had clean air—expanding on its previous focus of cleaning up polluted areas. They also included new requirements for areas that weren’t meeting clean air standards and tightened the rules around automobile emissions—a major source of pollution then, and now.
- The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 represented a major shift and were touted as cost-effective approaches to reducing air pollution. The amendments contained provisions to establish a national permits program, implement the Montreal Protocol to phase out chemicals depleting the ozone layer, and control acid rain with a market-based cap and trade program for emissions.
And until this point, the EPA regulated toxic air pollutants one chemical at a time—an inefficient process, since many sources of pollution release more than one. But these amendments required the EPA to identify whole categories of industrial sources for nearly 190 toxic air pollutants. The agency was now able to reduce pollution by requiring these industries to install appropriate pollution controls, such as emission monitoring systems, or change their production processes. And if a polluting facility failed to comply, the EPA could collect penalties or even sue the violators in court.
- The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 cemented a 2007 Supreme Court decision holding that the original 1970 Clean Air Act also covers climate-changing pollution—and reinvigorated EPA’s regulatory mandate with new funding, including grants and incentives to help industries, states, and localities pay for deeper pollution cuts.
How does the Clean Air Act authorize the EPA to control pollution?
The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to set national health-based standards for air pollution. It also requires the government to review, update, and enforce these standards. Ensuring they are reached and maintained locally, meanwhile, is largely left up to the states. And the rules apply not only to corporate polluters but to government projects like big highway expansions as well.
Two key tool sets
At the heart of the Clean Air Act, the EPA’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) specify levels of pollution that are deemed safe over different time periods. The six major pollutants regulated by the Clean Air Act’s NAAQS are ozone (O3), particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and lead (Pb). (Fun fact: The EPA added lead after NRDC took the agency to court in 1976—and won.) These are known as the six criteria pollutants.
Another set of tools is called technology-based emissions standards, which are based on the latest, most efficient, and cost-effective technologies for controlling pollution from various sources. For instance, under the Clean Air Act, new gas power plants must not emit more than 1,000 pounds of CO2 per megawatt hour of electricity produced. But the law does not spell out which specific piece of equipment a facility must use to meet those standards. Instead, it gives the industries flexibility and accommodates ever-changing technologies.
How are standards set?
In simple terms: Pollutants are governed under several different types of standards depending on what the pollutant is, the source of the pollutant, and what technologies currently exist to control it. One factor in how standards are set is whether the pollution comes from stationary sources, like factory buildings and power plants, or mobile sources, like cars, planes, and even lawn mowers. (This includes their fuels, like gasoline.)
Standards are also influenced by geography: The Clean Air Act establishes a national right to safe air, so dirty industries cannot simply relocate to a countryside with fewer people—or play states against one another with the threat of relocation. If the source of pollution is in an area with otherwise clean air (meaning it meets NAAQS), requirements are based on preventing the air quality from deteriorating. And if the polluter would worsen air quality in an area with already dirty air, in what’s referred to as a nonattainment area, requirements (and the deadlines to meet them) are different.
How are standards implemented?
The federal government sets national ambient air quality standards, but state and tribal governments are responsible for meeting and maintaining those standards. For instance, state implementation plans (SIPs) must demonstrate how each state intends to meet the NAAQS for the six criteria pollutants. These plans, of course, must be approved by the EPA—and it’s the EPA’s responsibility to establish federal plans that regulate pollution sources directly if the states’ plans fall short.
How does the Clean Air Act fight climate change?
Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA administrator is required to set standards for “the emission of any air pollutant…which in his judgment cause, or contribute to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.”
The language of the early law demonstrated the vision of its writers, equipping the EPA to respond to the health threats and advances in science that would inevitably emerge after 1970. Therefore, as carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases fuel climate change, the greatest public health and welfare crisis of our time, the agency has both the power and responsibility to regulate them.
This language, as it turned out, would be a major thorn in the side of dirty industries and their political allies. But the U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed the EPA’s obligation to regulate carbon pollution, including emissions from cars and power plants, in the 2007 landmark decision in Massachusetts v. EPA (in which NRDC joined states and other environmental groups to successfully sue the EPA to take action); American Electric Power v. Connecticut (2011); and Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA (2014). And in 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act officially established carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels as an “air pollutant” within the text of the Clean Air Act.
Has the Clean Air Act been successful?
One remarkable quality of the Clean Air Act is how its benefits can literally be seen and felt. In many communities, the air is visibly cleaner and it’s safer to breathe. Fewer people enter our hospitals with cardiac and respiratory issues from smog. More people are able to avoid missing school and work because of illness. And federal and state governments are able to assemble critical building blocks for climate action.
Since 1990, fine particulate matter pollution—the deadliest form of air pollution—has declined by 41 percent, and ozone pollution has declined by 22 percent. Cleaner air means a decline in environmentally related respiratory illnesses, which in turn saves on health-care costs—a boon to our quality of life as well as to the American economy. A 2020 report commissioned by NRDC found that the annual benefits of Clean Air Act programs prevented 370,000 premature deaths—and the EPA had similar findings.
The NRDC-commissioned report also found that the annual benefits of clean air standards are up to 32 times greater than their costs. Programs running under the Clean Air Act will have a net benefit of $2.5 to $5 trillion annually by 2030. (Take a look at this map to see how your area has benefitted.)
The NRDC report also found that by 2030, programs under the 1990 amendments will have lowered the amount of CO2 and methane emissions enough to avoid $63 billion in climate-related economic damages annually.
What challenges does the Clean Air Act face?
Although air pollution has decreased significantly since the 1960s, more than 20 million people still reside in counties that have PM levels over the legal limit, and more than 122 million people live in areas contaminated with smog. And due to historically racist and discriminatory practices in regard to housing, highways, and other development, those that suffer the most from air pollution are often low-income communities and communities of color that are already overburdened by pollution.
In addition, early research has found a link between counties with higher levels of soot pollution and higher death rates from COVID-19 and its variants.
The Clean Air Act has felt the push and pull of different presidential administrations and their priorities. Most recently, the Trump administration attempted to gut the Clean Air Act—to weaken or not enforce clean air standards—to placate the dirty energy industry. When President Joe Biden took office, he promised to review and reinstate what Trump had rolled back and to vigorously implement the law. As noted in Grist’s tracker, so far, Biden has successfully reversed 13 out of the 61 rollbacks that Trump implemented during his four years in office. In many ways, this push and pull represents the importance of citizen organizations like NRDC: Regardless of who is in the White House, public advocacy and the courts have helped ensure the executive branch fulfills its legal responsibilities and that Congress strengthens the law.
Litigation and legislation
In June 2022, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority restricted how the EPA can limit climate pollution from power plants in a case called West Virginia v. EPA. This was a setback, but not a deathblow to the fight against the climate crisis.
In response, when Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, it amended the Clean Air Act and reinforced that carbon dioxide emitted from fossil fuels is an air pollutant and that the EPA has the authority, and responsibility, to regulate it. In addition, it provides hundreds of billions of dollars in tax incentives and grants to reduce the cost of meeting those standards for power companies, car companies, and their customers—thus empowering the EPA to set stronger standards than it could have without these incentives.
Thus, the battle continues: Whether it’s a debate over California’s authority to set its own vehicle emission standards or the EPA’s failure to curb smog in major cities, the Clean Air Act is in a constant tug of war in our courts, statehouses, and federal agencies.
What is NRDC doing to defend the Clean Air Act?
Since our founding, NRDC has been a committed champion for clean air on behalf of public health and the climate. Our policy experts and scientists—many of whom have been in the fight for decades—advise and testify in front of Congress, advocating for stronger protections and pushing back against loopholes for dirty fossil fuels. Our litigation team also works to defend the integrity of the Clean Air Act by suing polluters, and oftentimes the EPA itself. Together with our activists, we continue to demand that our elected officials fight for people over polluters, and preserve the mission of the law first set forth by a bipartisan Congress so many years ago.
This NRDC.org story is available for online republication by news media outlets or nonprofits under these conditions: The writer(s) must be credited with a byline; you must note prominently that the story was originally published by NRDC.org and link to the original; the story cannot be edited (beyond simple things such as time and place elements, style, and grammar); you can’t resell the story in any form or grant republishing rights to other outlets; you can’t republish our material wholesale or automatically—you need to select stories individually; you can’t republish the photos or graphics on our site without specific permission; you should drop us a note to let us know when you’ve used one of our stories.