It’s Essential to Act on Climate Emergencies, But a Mistake for Biden to Declare One
The following is an excerpt from a Sustain What blog post.
With pressure from the left building again on President Joe Biden to declare a national climate emergency, it’s time for a #Watchwords entry on this phrase, both on the wider use of “emergency” in climate context and in relation to what presidents and other leaders can or should do under laws like the 1976 U.S. National Emergencies Act.
I’m not against the phrase. It’s a great starting point for solution-focused discussion. What’s your definition? Who is facing the emergency? What forces, local and global, are driving it? What are the remedies?
Climate emergencies abound – most of them still the result of underlying vulnerability emergencies. And without greatly intensified action to slow warming by cutting and sopping up heat-trapping gases, most the result of the global fossil fuel binge, humans absolutely face what James Howard Kunstler back in 2005 described as a “Long Emergency” (which is why he’s joining my webcast today with the authors Erica Gies and Eric Sanderson).
But I disagree with McKibben, Reynolds and dozens more on the merits, political and practical, of Biden moving from his appropriate rhetoric now – saying we’re in an emergency and why – to the formal step.
Read the in-depth report and other background produced by Goitein and others at the Brennan Center. I also appreciate this visual starting point from the Center:
So join me today at 1 p.m. You’ll meet the journalist Erica Gies, author of “Water Always Wins,” a global tour pointing out the existential threats that arise when people forget the reality in the title, but also paths to building a more respectful relationship with water, and Eric W. Sanderson, a senior ecologist at the Wildlife Conservation Society best known for his bestseller “Mannahatta.”